SHIPPING firms may need to pay a fee to use the Baltic Sea, one of the world's busiest shipping routes, in order to cover the high costs of protecting undersea cables, Estonia's defence minister said following a spate of breaches.
NATO had said it would deploy frigates, patrol aircraft and drones in the Baltic Sea after a series of incidents where ships have damaged power and communications cables with their anchors in acts of suspected sabotage.
In addition to the patrols, Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur said countries are weighing other measures to protect cables, including installing sensors to detect anchors dragged across the sea floor or constructing casings or walls around the cables.
But this will come at a cost, and whether countries or cable operators end up paying for it, consumers may be left ultimately footing the bill through higher taxes or utility costs.
Another option, Mr Pevkur said, is levying a tax on vessels that sail through the Baltic Sea, which is bordered by eight NATO countries and Russia.
'Let's say that when you go to the airport you have the landing fee, you have the airport fee and this is paid in the ticket,' he told Reuters in an interview in Tokyo.
'So, in one moment maybe we will see that when you are passing through the Danish straits there will be a cost for the companies to pay this because this is basically an insurance fee to damaging the cables.'
Mr Pevkur added that there were different options on the table and that countries would have to find a common solution.
Globally, around 150 undersea cables are damaged each year, according to the UK-based International Cable Protection Committee.
The telecoms cables, power lines and gas pipes in the shallow Baltic are seen as particularly vulnerable due to its very intense traffic, with as many as 4,000 ships crossing its surface every day, according to some estimates.
SeaNews Turkey
NATO had said it would deploy frigates, patrol aircraft and drones in the Baltic Sea after a series of incidents where ships have damaged power and communications cables with their anchors in acts of suspected sabotage.
In addition to the patrols, Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur said countries are weighing other measures to protect cables, including installing sensors to detect anchors dragged across the sea floor or constructing casings or walls around the cables.
But this will come at a cost, and whether countries or cable operators end up paying for it, consumers may be left ultimately footing the bill through higher taxes or utility costs.
Another option, Mr Pevkur said, is levying a tax on vessels that sail through the Baltic Sea, which is bordered by eight NATO countries and Russia.
'Let's say that when you go to the airport you have the landing fee, you have the airport fee and this is paid in the ticket,' he told Reuters in an interview in Tokyo.
'So, in one moment maybe we will see that when you are passing through the Danish straits there will be a cost for the companies to pay this because this is basically an insurance fee to damaging the cables.'
Mr Pevkur added that there were different options on the table and that countries would have to find a common solution.
Globally, around 150 undersea cables are damaged each year, according to the UK-based International Cable Protection Committee.
The telecoms cables, power lines and gas pipes in the shallow Baltic are seen as particularly vulnerable due to its very intense traffic, with as many as 4,000 ships crossing its surface every day, according to some estimates.
SeaNews Turkey
