Port call selections of some shipping alliances are ’illogical’:...
Reklam
Reklam
Reklam

Port call selections of some shipping alliances are 'illogical': Drewry

The London-based shipping research and consulting firm, Drewry, has concluded from examining the correlation between carrier terminal ownership and the choice of port calls by shipping alliances that the choice of port call is often not in line with carrier terminal ownership interests.

16 March 2017 - 20:00 - Update: 17 March 2017 - 01:32

"Our analysis shows that even when a shipping line has a significant stake in a terminal, this doesn't necessarily mean that the port is selected for the network schedule," said Drewry's senior analyst for ports and terminals, Neil Davidson. "The picture is very varied: in some cases, the correlation is tight, in others there is no obvious logic at all."

Drewry said it looked at both gateway markets in the Benelux countries, the Southwest Pacific, Southwest and South China/Hong Kong, as well as at transshipment hubs in Southeast Asia, the Mediterranean, the Middle East and Central America/Caribbean, reported American Shipper.

"For gateway ports, you can see that carriers have to bear in mind the port preferences of shippers, for example, so the choice of port is influenced by other factors," Mr Davidson said. "But what was particularly surprising was that for the choice of transshipment hub, which is entirely within the control of a carrier, the correlation was also weak in a number of cases."

As an example, Drewry pointed to ports in Benelux, where it said in its Ports and Terminals Insight report, "The port choices made by the Ocean and THE Alliances correlate very closely to the member lines' terminal interests, but for the 2M, the opposite is true."

"What this analysis shows is that individual lines are not entirely in control of their own destinies when it comes to port choices, as partner lines in their alliances may have conflicting port choice preferences and particular idiosyncrasies," Mr Davidson said.

"Moreover, even if alliance partners have corresponding port preferences, there is still potential for conflict at the terminal level if more than one line in an alliance has interests in different terminals in the same port, as is the case with the Ocean Alliance in Rotterdam for example.

 

 

 

This news 603 hits received.

COMMENTS

  • 0 Comment
No comments added yet. Be the first to comment..
MAY INTEREST YOU x
Automation could meet shortfall of 147,000 seafarers by 2025
Automation could meet shortfall of 147,000 seafarers by 2025
M/V IKRA and 10 casualties rescued by Turkey's Med Marine
M/V IKRA and 10 casualties rescued by Turkey's Med Marine