TurkishMaritimeNews
Home FAQ RSS Links Site Map Contact Thursday, 23.May.2013, 02:52 (GMT+3)
All News
COLUMNISTS
   » CAHIT ISTIKBAL
   » NILUFER ORAL
   » STEVE PELECANOS
   » SULEYMAN SAVAS
WORLD SHIPPING
SHIPPING NEWS
   » TURKISH STRAITS
   » ENERGY
      » Pipelines
   » CONTAINER
   » PORTS
      » HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
   » CRUISE NEWS
   » PILOTAGE&TOWAGE
   » SAFETY&SECURITY
   » Environmental
   » Towage & Salvage
   » NAVY NEWS
   » Fishing
   » TANKERS
   » DRY BULK
SHIPBUILDING
ACCIDENTS
MARKETS
LOGISTICS
DEMOLITION
IMO&EU NEWS
PIRACY
TURKISH PRESS REVIEW
SEA SPORTS
NEWS FROM TURKEY
   » Anatolian Agency
   » Hurriyet Daily News
   » HDAILYNEWS
LLOYD'S LIST
INSIGHT/OPINION
SHIPBROKER REPORTS
Poll
What you expect from freight market in 2013?
Better than 2012.
Worse than 2012.
Continue recovering.
Steady up.
Rapid rise.
None


 
MARKETS


Do shipping alliances manipulate the market?

Do shipping alliances manipulate the market?

The US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has increased its oversight of the world’s biggest shipping alliances, which it warns have the potential to manipulate the market.
Monday, 17.Jan.2011, 13:21 (GMT+3)

The US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has increased its oversight of the world’s biggest shipping alliances, which it warns have the potential to manipulate the market.

The FMC has told the The Grand Alliance, New World Alliance and CKYH Alliance to file monitoring reports, which include capacity and volume data, for their US services monthly rather than every 75 days.

They alliances, which include Hapag-Lloyd, OOCL, NYK, APL, MOL, HMM, Coscon, K Line, Yang Ming and Hanjin, have also been ordered to provide notice of any plans to change capacity levels and services.

The FMC also demanded they provide copies of minutes of senior committee meetings held to approve capacity and schedule recommendations.

Carriers are already required to file notice of vessel substitutions or changes in sailing schedules that cause a change of 5% or more in capacity in a certain trade lane.

The new requirements follow last year’s FMC investigation into shipping line alliances on US trades, sparked when a shortage of vessels – caused by an unexpected surge in volumes just as shipping lines removed capacity – resulted in a rapid series of rate increases.

The investigation recommended that the FMC increase its oversight of vessel alliances with services to and from the US to allay fears that they could withhold capacity to manipulate rates.

The FMC said “a concerted reduction in vessel capacity and the restrictions imposed by capacity rationalisation authority can result in a shortage of vessel space in a trade lane leading to an unreasonable decrease in service”.

It could also “artificially induce upward pressure on rate levels, potentially leading to an unreasonable increase in rates”.
IFW News

Read: 4401 Times- FMC, Market, Manipulation, Shipping alliances, -


Rating (Votes: 0)
Add your comment(Existing: 0)  Tell friend  Print

COMMENTS ( 0 Existing)

Related Articles:






Events
May 2013
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
 

News in Pictures


Big Yellow bird taking off as big blue EBBA MAERSK is coming into Port of Rotterdam


Hot News
Cross-NWE clean freight rates plunge on weak fundamentals: sources
Rates plunge to their lowest level since February 2012
Hamburg Süd 2012: Better, but not yet good enough
Drewry transpacific spot rates lose 4.3pc to US$2,032/FEU in one week
Cosco hikes intra-Asia rates from Far East to Indian subcontinent May 15
Maersk to raise intra-Asia, Mideast, East Africa Med rates from June
Capesizes End Nine-Day Winning Streak Amid Slowing China Demand
Asian VLCC rate hits w40 first time in 3 months on rush to cover May cargoes
Singapore-linked Simatech buys two 3,300-TEU vessels from ER Shiffahrt
G E Shipping: Crude Tanker Market Continues to Underperform

 
Archive Search